By Refusing Chemotherapy Cancer Patients Live 4X Longer! Result of This Doctor’s Research
Today, one of the most expensive medical treatments in the world is chemotherapy. But is it really so effective? Thanks to documentaries like the ‘Truth About Cancer’ series or the alternative media, more and more people are actually beginning to question not only the efficacy of this treatment, but also whether it does more harm than good.
Believe it or not that, maybe we already had answer on that question more than 40 years ago. One shocking research was released that could have ended the chemo experiment — if anyone had been paying attention.
A former Professor of Physiology and Medical Physics at Berkeley, California, Dr. Hardin B. Jones, made a conclusion after over 25 years of research. He concluded that not only that radiation, chemotherapy and surgery do not work and do not prolong a cancer patient’s life, but in many cases patients who receive these oncological treatments die sooner than those who choose not to follow the treatment. They also die a much more painful death.
“People who refused chemotherapy treatment live an average of 12 and a half years longer than those who decide to receive chemotherapy,” wrote Dr. Jones in the journal of the New York Academy of Sciences.
In 1969 he made a presentation of his research at the American Cancer Society’s Science Writers’ Seminar. The amazing findings and results still send shockwaves through the cancer industry to this day.
Chemotherapy does not work the way it is supposed to
The body is left defenseless and weakened against the disease because chemotherapy in fact kills the healthy cells sooner than it affects the cancer cells. There are also major side effects of the treatment toxins on top and the human body is simply left barely holding on to life with no immune system to heal itself.
“It is not the cancer that kills the victim. It’s the breakdown of the defense mechanism that eventually brings death,” said Jones. He and his wife considered what they would do if they were to develop cancer and they both agreed that instead doing everything to keep the body in as healthy state as possible, they would stay clear of mainstream treatments.
Jones’ Studies on Vitamins Treatment
Jones’ research showed that nutritional treatment have great potential. Doctors Linus Pauling and A. Hoffer made analysis and reported on Jones’ multiple studies. The results show that on average cancer patients who followed a vitamins and minerals regimen had 4 times longer survival times than patients who were didn’t follow the protocol. Their conclusion was that as soon as possible all cancer patients have to start this natural protocol.
The regimen included:
- a daily dose of 12 g Vitamin C,
- folic acid,
- Vitamin B6, B3 and other B-Vitamins,
- beta carotene,
- Vitamin E,
- selenium and sometimes other minerals.
Natural minerals and vitamins are almost always the best choice. Other parts of the treatment were following a balanced and healthy diet. Taking care of the mental health of the patients was very important as well.
Other Conclusions about the modern disease- Cancer
“A Report on Cancer” gave the following conclusions analyzing years of his research:
There is a strong link between cancer and carcinogens
Jones stated that the more the person was exposed to a carcinogen, the higher their risk of developing cancer is. Different carcinogens have a slightly different timeframe and effect. But the stronger the dose of carcinogen is, the less time it takes for cancer to develop. With so many carcinogens in today’s food, water and air, it’s no wonder why cancer rates have been continuously on the rise.
Radiation and Surgery survival data is faulty and biased
Jones provides multiple examples of mistakes or errors in the data when it comes to comparing rates in survival of patients who went through radiation and/or surgery versus those who didn’t follow a treatment. Most studies he had seen did not take into consideration patients who actually died before the completion of their treatment.
There was an omission of their deaths from the data as “rejected.” By defining two groups as treated and untreated, the treated group, in order to be counted in the study, had to have finished the treatment. The study looked at whether or not the patient survived after the operation or surgery was over. Those who died during these two types of treatment did not “meet the criteria”. They were not “treated” group, and were in fact omitted. Jones stated that the longer the study was, and the more steps it had and the more errors were in the study.
The entire list of Jones’s papers (which was written over a 41-year period) is available online in The Bancroft Library of Berkeley, California.
Has Chemo’s Efficacy Changed?
If you’ve ever met a cancer survivor you know that there are plenty of them out there who have undergone chemo treatments and survived.
With the right nutritional protocol, mindset, emotional support, and other factors it is possible to live on and heal the body after chemo. So recent studies have not exactly been in chemotherapy’s favor. Even though some have defended the procedure because of recent “advancements,” the survival rate has remained questionable. It is even dismal compared to holistic and natural treatments being undertaken in people’s homes and at specialty clinics.
According to a major study conducted by the Department of Radiation Oncology at Northern Sydney Cancer Centre and published in the December 2004 issue of Clinical Oncology, chemotherapy’s real impact on the survival of American adults is a mere 2.1%, and that’s only for up to five years, not a “true survival rate.”
With so many nasty side effects surrounding chemo and so much risk, do you think it’s worth the risk?